Film Finder: Mood-Led Discovery
Helping Radio Times app users find their next favourite film by mood, not just by title.

Project details
Team
Kanza Leghari
Snr Product Designer
Max C.
Alex M.
Lead App Developer
Platforms & Softwares
UserTesting
User research
Loveable
Initial ideation
Claude Design
Prototyping
Summary
Most successful acquisition drive since app launch
Uplift in session durations
Continue reading for the detailed version.
Research &
Discovery
Old discovery experience
Discovery in the app relied on keyword search and a filter sheet of type, genre and streaming service. It worked for users who knew what they were looking for, but offered little help to someone who just wanted something good to watch tonight.
We retained the keyword and filter search experience in the new design but added in a layer of more exploratory queries with the film finder.



From editorial experiment to concept
The idea came out of AI experimentation within RT editorial, who used Lovable to quickly prototype a standalone Film Finder on the web. It explored three discovery modes: “I’m in the mood for…”, where users pick a vibe such as Feel-Good or Mind-Bending; “I want something like…”, where users enter a film they love; and Random Roulette, which picks a single film within the user’s filters. Each mode surfaced RT-reviewed films with star ratings, trailers and where to watch.
Rather than starting from scratch, we used this prototype as a ready-made test bed to validate the concept with real users before investing in native design.
User testing
We tested the prototype with around 20 participants through UserTesting, covering current habits, a task for each mode and overall sentiment.
Mood-based selection performed best. Most participants felt the results matched their expectations and trusted them, often because they recognised the films. “Something like” was more mixed: searching for Pride & Prejudice returned romantic comedies when participants expected period dramas, showing the model leaned too heavily on vibe over attributes like era and genre. Random Roulette split opinion, with some finding it playful and others frustrated by repeats and older titles.
Across all modes, participants felt six results was too few, wanted more recent films and broader streaming coverage, and questioned where star ratings came from. Most didn’t use filters, simply because there weren’t enough results to narrow down.
Design & Experimentation
Phase 2
Version 1: bringing Film Finder into the app
I translated the concept into a native flow focused on the strongest modes. Random Roulette was dropped, and the mood journey became a guided sequence: choose a mood, say whether you’re watching with family, and select your streaming services.
To address the genre accuracy issue, I added an optional “match the vibe” step where users tick films that fit their mood before seeing results. This gives the model a clearer signal while staying skippable for users who want to go straight to recommendations. Results moved from six cards to a full poster grid, with a Refine sheet for streaming service and a recency slider responding directly to feedback about older films.
Film Finder was introduced through a “Try our Film Finder” card on the homepage and a “Looking for a film?” section below the search bar on Discover.
Version 2: giving discovery its own space
In V1, Film Finder sat beneath search, competing for attention on a single screen. In V2, I separated them with a Search / Film Finder toggle at the top of Discover, so keyword search and mood-led discovery each have a clear, dedicated space.
The “something like” search gained year labels in autocomplete to help users pick the right title, and a short note explains that picks are based on RT reviews and star ratings enhanced by smart technology, responding to testers’ questions about trust and transparency.
A/B testing film finder
To measure its impact, we ran an A/B test where half of app users had access to Film Finder and half did not. We compared how each group engaged with the app and how often they returned. The Film Finder group came out ahead, showing higher engagement and stronger return visits, which gave us the confidence to roll it out to everyone.






